Talk to us about your process automation.
A half-hour first conversation, no obligation. Tell us about the processes that cost you and what they deliver, and we will advise you on approach, choice of tools and a realistic sequence for automation.
From quote-to-order to HR onboarding and compliance flows: we first look at which processes create volume and pain, and only then choose between iPaaS, RPA, BPM, low-code or a custom build. Independent advice, followed by implementation in sprints.
Many organisations start with "we'll buy Zapier" or "we'll deploy UiPath" and then get stuck on the first real exception: a form that deviates, an ERP field that changes, an approval step that requires human judgement. Process automation only works when you first map out the chain, then quantify the pain points, and only then choose the tools.
We are an independent implementation partner. We don't build a platform of our own that we are keen to sell. For each process, we choose between low-code, iPaaS, a BPM engine such as Camunda, RPA bots or a custom build. For the complex, industry-specific and deeply integrated parts, we do the custom work ourselves. For the simple work, we use standard platforms efficiently.
We mainly work with mid-market SMEs, industry associations, healthcare providers, cooperatives and scale-ups that have moved beyond the Excel stage. That's where the gains are usually greatest: manual quote flows, email ping-pong about invoices, approvals sitting in a shared mailbox, and data retyped across three different systems. Not because the teams are doing it wrong, but because the systems were never meant to work together.
The common thread in our approach: measure first, then model, then build. A process that hasn't been measured first (manual time, volume, error rate, lead time) can't be automated honestly, because nobody knows whether the business case stacks up. We'd rather spend an extra week on analysis than three months building plumbing for a process that in reality only runs ten times a month.
The umbrella term breaks down roughly into three flavours. In practice we combine them: an iPaaS integration that handles the standard data, a BPM engine for human approvals, and custom logic for the industry-specific rules.
The plumbing between your existing applications. An order from your webshop to your ERP, an invoice from your accounting system to Peppol, a lead from your form to your CRM. Often via iPaaS (Workato, Make, Zapier) or direct API integrations where volume or latency demands it. See also our API and integration approach.
When a process runs across several departments, includes escalations, or requires a four-eyes principle, you need a process engine that tracks status and assigns tasks to people. We work with BPM platforms such as Camunda and Flowable; for industry organisations we often build a custom BPM platform with BPMN/DMN as its backbone.
For flows that process unstructured input (incoming invoices, complaint letters, contracts, forms), we combine document AI (OCR plus LLM classification) with RPA bots that operate legacy applications where no API is available. For the entire paper flow we offer a dedicated document workflow service.
No loose reports and no vague transformation story. At the end of the project you have working, monitored processes plus the documentation to develop them further yourselves.
Not every organisation needs custom process automation. Four profiles where we make the difference; if you recognise yourself, we'd be happy to talk further.
Organisations with manual quoting, order and invoicing flows that, with 30+ employees and growing volume, are hitting the limits of spreadsheets and shared mailboxes. Early gains usually lie in the quote-to-order chain and the incoming invoice flow.
Industry organisations and cooperatives that must run the same process chain for dozens of members: member onboarding, claims, certification. We almost always build custom solutions here because standard platforms cannot handle the multi-tenant role model.
Healthcare providers and government organisations with heavy administrative flows (intake, referrals, claims, permit issuing) where GDPR and NEN 7510 apply strictly. Standard low-code platforms often struggle with these compliance requirements.
Concerns with multiple business units that run the same process differently in each unit, and scale-ups that are outgrowing their first tooling layer. Both need a process engine that supports variation without the governance falling apart.
Together with your team, we map out the current state of your key processes. For each process we record the steps, lead time, volumes, error frequency, waiting times, systems involved and pain points. No abstract transformation talk, just concrete measurements.
We score processes on three axes: volume (how many transactions per month), effort to automate (technical complexity, number of systems) and strategic value. This produces a ranked list, so you decide which process is tackled first.
For each prioritised process, we assess: can an iPaaS handle this? Does low-code such as Power Automate fit? Do we need a BPM engine? Or does this need custom development? We are honest when a standard platform is sufficient. We have no incentive to build everything from scratch.
We build in short iterations. Each sprint delivers a working process or a working part of a chain, not weeks of plumbing with no visible output. You test along the way, and so do your end users. This takes you through a multi-sprint programme from a first process to a mature process landscape.
After go-live we keep measuring: which processes deliver value, where new bottlenecks emerge, and which exceptions need human attention. Based on this, we plan the next round of improvements. Process automation is a continuous programme, not a project with an end date.
These are the flows we most often encounter. This is not an exhaustive list. Usually an organisation combines three or four of them, and we build the process landscape around those.
From configuration and pricing calculation through to quote, contract, order and invoice. Central product logic, a rules engine for discounts, e-signing and integration with your ERP. We have a dedicated service for this: custom CPQ and product configurator.
Incoming invoices are read via OCR, VAT numbers are validated, a cost centre is suggested, and the approval route determines who is asked to sign off. Outgoing invoices are sent via Peppol to government bodies and large customers. Postings flow back into the accounts automatically.
A new employee triggers an SSO account, payroll registration, IT asset assignment and training invitations, multiple systems, one process. On the customer side: complaints and tickets arriving by email, form or web chat are classified, routed and monitored against SLAs, linked to the CRM.
An honest comparison. For most automation needs, a combination of standard platforms is enough. Custom development pays off in four specific situations.
For SaaS-to-SaaS flows with common connectors (HubSpot, Stripe, Slack, Google Workspace), an iPaaS is almost always faster and cheaper than a custom build. In that case, we help you with the setup rather than building something of our own.
Simple request or approval flows with linear sign-off work perfectly well in Microsoft Power Automate or another low-code platform. That's often enough for a first layer of process automation in many small and mid-sized businesses.
Once a process runs across more than four systems, is subject to sector-specific regulation and can't be squeezed into a standard connector, custom development is often cheaper in the long run than stretching a layer that was never designed for the job.
Industry organisations with multi-tenant role models, or processes in which LLM classification and document AI are interwoven with human approval, call for custom enterprise software that treats these concepts as first-class citizens.
We're platform-agnostic. The right choice depends on your existing landscape, the type of processes involved and how much of the management you want your own team to handle.
For screen-scraping flows and legacy applications without a proper API. RPA bots work well for repeatable data entry tasks, but they're brittle when the user interface changes. We use them where they're the only option, and build a proper API layer over them wherever that's possible.
iPaaS platforms for SaaS integrations and low-code for lightweight workflow automation. We have senior experience with Workato and Make for mid-sized integration landscapes, and with Microsoft Power Automate for organisations that rely heavily on the Microsoft stack.
For process engines with BPMN/DMN at their core, we typically choose Camunda or Flowable. Around that we build custom front ends, integrations and rules modules. For multi-tenant industry platforms, AI flows and deep integrations, this is the combination where we deliver the most value.
Process automation almost always involves sensitive data: staff records, financial flows, client communications. Auditability of a process isn't an extra — it's a design decision we build in from sprint one.
The questions clients ask before starting an automation project.
A half-hour first conversation, no obligation. Tell us about the processes that cost you and what they deliver, and we will advise you on approach, choice of tools and a realistic sequence for automation.
Appfront uses cookies and similar technologies to keep the website working properly, for analytics and for marketing. You choose what you allow. Read more in our privacy policy.