A live, interactive AI workshop for teams across the Netherlands and beyond. No pre-recorded video, but a real facilitator, breakout rooms and hands-on practice with the tools your team uses every day. Designed for organisations that want to bring their people along practically without flying everyone to one location.
Our online AI workshop is a live, guided session in which your team learns to apply AI tools practically in their own work. Not a webinar, nor a YouTube course that people click through at their own pace, but a real facilitator, a co-facilitator, and participants who, with cameras on, practise together on the tools your team uses every day.
The only difference from our in-person variant in Amsterdam is the channel. The content, modules and hands-on approach are comparable to our corporate AI training and AI training for teams. Online means no travel budget is needed, it is geographically flexible, and the session can be recorded for later reuse.
We deliberately opt for shorter, focused sessions rather than a full day in front of a screen. Screen fatigue is real: a six-hour online workshop in one go simply doesn't work. That is why we work in segments of roughly an hour, with breaks, alternating between plenary explanation, breakout work and self-practice.
The target audience is broad: teams just starting with AI, teams with some experience who still mostly work at the surface level, and teams who want to go deeper into a specific use case. Your group's knowledge level determines the entry point: the modules are modular and tailored during the intake conversation. For people who are already well along we scale up to advanced topics; for those still getting started we stay longer on the basics.
Organisations with offices in different cities or countries. Bring everyone along at once without anyone having to travel or sit in an empty room.
Friesland, Limburg, Zeeland, Twente — an in-person workshop in Amsterdam means half a day's travel each way. Online works straight away.
English-language sessions on request. The same content, a different language. Useful for teams with people in Berlin, Antwerp, London or further afield.
Teams already used to video meetings don't want a mandatory office day for training that works just as well online.
Booking an external venue, arranging lunch, scheduling people off — an online session removes much of that overhead.
No room or catering needs arranging. An online workshop is practically quicker to schedule than an on-site programme.
No pre-recorded video. An experienced facilitator leads every session, while a co-facilitator manages the chat, supports breakouts and keeps the pace. Questions get answered straight away, not later on a forum.
We don't work with generic demo environments. We use the tools your team already works with: shared screens, live exercises, your own documents. Whatever is built during the session, everyone takes straight back to their work.
Before the session, participants receive intake questions and reading material. Afterwards there is a homework assignment and a follow-up moment to answer questions. The workshop is therefore more than a single session: it is a learning programme with the live session at its core.
The content is modular and is tailored to the knowledge level of your team. It is comparable to our other AI workshops, adapted to the online format.
How to instruct an AI model so that it gives useful output. Practical exercises.
Which model is suitable when: ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, specialised tools.
The most valuable applications per function: sales, marketing, finance, operations.
What may and may not go into a prompt, GDPR considerations, handling company data.
Summarising, rewriting, translating, formatting: efficiently and consistently.
First steps towards AI agents and workflows, aligned with your own processes.
How to weigh AI output, where the risk of errors lies, and when not to trust it.
Participants bring one concrete task of their own and work it out in breakouts.
We work on the video platform your organisation already uses: Zoom, Microsoft Teams or Google Meet. No extra accounts, no IT tickets, no tool fatigue. We also use Miro or FigJam for collaborative work.
We work with groups of around eight to twelve participants per session. A camera-on policy is part of the format, as engagement depends on it. For larger organisations we run several parallel or consecutive groups.
One lead facilitator guides the pace and content. A co-facilitator manages the chat, steps in on technical questions and supports the breakout rooms. This keeps the live session running smoothly without everyone waiting on one person.
For some teams, coming together in person makes sense; other teams benefit more from online. Online means no travel costs, no overnight stays, and easier scheduling for people with caring responsibilities or hybrid working patterns. A recording remains available for anyone who couldn't attend or wants to watch it later.
There are downsides too. Informal connections, the chat after the session and the conversation over lunch, are harder to replicate online. Long days in front of a screen are exhausting, which is why we opt for shorter segments rather than one long marathon day. And some hands-on tool walkthroughs work a little more directly when someone can look over a laptop in person.
Ultimately, the question is not whether online is better than in-person or vice versa; it is what suits your team, your geography and your working rhythm. If you are unsure, we can also design a hybrid setup, with an in-person kick-off and online follow-up sessions. Our experience is that hybrid works well for organisations that want to invest in the social element while keeping the actual training hours efficient.
Rather than one long block, we work in focused segments of around an hour, followed by a proper break. This suits how the brain functions behind a screen and keeps attention high.
The three formats alternate: a short plenary explanation, breakout rooms for group exercises, and self-paced moments on your own laptop. That way, nobody is passively listening.
Lots of small micro-interaction moments — a poll, a question in the chat, a quick hand-raise — keep participants actively engaged rather than passively consuming content.
In the breakouts, we mix departments together. This forces participants to explain their own work to someone in a different role — and often produces the most surprising insights.
The workshop is not a one-off event but a learning journey. Before the live session, participants receive intake questions about their role, their biggest time-consuming tasks, and their previous experience with AI tools. We also send a short selection of reading material — deliberately kept brief, not a 60-page PDF.
During the session itself, we work hands-on with the team's own tools and documents. What is built by the end of the session — prompts, templates, workflows — can be used straight away as practical material. No academic slides, just practical output.
Afterwards, there is a homework assignment that participants tackle over the following few weeks, plus a follow-up session where they share their experiences and ask questions that came up during implementation. That follow-up is what makes the impact lasting — without it, the insights typically fade quickly.
It also helps that participants bring their own examples and documents to the workshop. Instead of practising on invented case studies, they work directly on something they have on their desk. The effect is that the step from "interesting to hear" to "I'm already using it on Monday" becomes much smaller. We regularly see participants showing new workflows to colleagues within a week of the workshop — often in a way that lifts the whole team, including those who didn't attend the session themselves.
For managers and team leads, we add a short management session discussing how AI adoption can be encouraged within the team, which signals point to a blockage somewhere, and which governance questions need addressing — think data use, quality control and intellectual property of AI output. This session is designed to outline the broader organisational context within which individual participants then continue working.
For organisations looking to take this further, the workshop fits naturally into a follow-on programme — a broader AI business training, an in-depth AI literacy training, or an enterprise AI implementation where AI applications genuinely land in workflows and systems.
A webinar is one-way traffic — someone broadcasts, the rest watch. Our workshop is two-way: active participation, practice, asking questions, working in breakouts. If you only want to sit and watch passively, this isn't for you.
Not a video library that people click through at their own pace. We do offer a live moment where the team works through the material together. For self-study courses there are cheaper alternatives — our approach simply doesn't suit that.
An in-person workshop can last a full day because people have already travelled to a venue. Online, that doesn't work — screen fatigue is real. That's why we use shorter, focused segments, possibly spread across several sessions.
A half-hour introductory call in which we discuss your team's level, the tools you use, the size of the group and which format fits. This is followed by a concrete proposal with scope and price.
Appfront uses cookies and similar technologies to keep the website working properly, for analytics and for marketing. You choose what you allow. Read more in our privacy policy.
