From our experience, a good start in AI for transport is not a big-bang roadmap but one carefully chosen use case where the impact is measurable. That is usually either an ETA prediction on a single corridor, a document AI flow on CMRs, or predictive maintenance on one vehicle type. Something that goes live in a few sprints and that the planning team can use straight away.
We build outwards from that first success. Only once the first flow runs reliably and has earned the trust of planners and drivers do we expand to the next domain. That order is not organisational caution; it is practical. AI systems that are not useful to the people on the shop floor from day one are rarely adopted, however good the model.
We often work alongside your existing TMS vendor, telematics partner and, where relevant, your fleet management team. The pages on building transport software and developing a fleet management app explain more about what our broader transport practice looks like. If you'd rather explore the visual side of AI (damage inspection, number plate recognition, dock cameras), see computer vision applications.
For organisations that want to think beyond a single use case, covering multiple domains, a genuine AI roadmap, governance and staff training, we work within our wider practice on enterprise AI implementation. There, the greater the ambition, the more important the right sequence. We help with that order, not just with the code.
Our AI transport practice serves a broad range of organisations: transport companies with their own fleets, couriers and last-mile operators, 3PL and 4PL planners, fleet owners, multimodal shippers (rail, waterway, road), distribution centres linking logistics and warehousing, and MaaS or car-sharing platforms that want to work with data. Public transport organisations (NS, GVB, RET) and autonomous vehicle start-ups form more of the market context in which we operate than our direct client base, although we regularly share insights from other projects with them.