Service · Software development

High-availability system development for mission-critical applications.

Custom high availability architectures for platforms that simply cannot go down. From redundant database clusters and multi-region failover to observability and runbook discipline, we build around a concrete uptime target that suits your business case.

Multi-region failoverDatabase HASLO/SLI & error budgetsBlue-green deployment

High availability is not a tick box, it is a design decision.

A high availability (HA) system is a platform designed so that a failure in a single component (a server, a data centre, a network link, a database replica) does not lead to a service outage for your end users. That sounds simple, but it affects every layer of your stack: how you write your application, how your database is set up, how your network routes traffic, how your deployments run, and how your team responds when something breaks at half past two in the morning.

We design and build high-availability systems for organisations where downtime immediately costs money or trust: payment providers, banks and insurers, telecoms, e-commerce platforms during peak moments such as Black Friday, healthcare providers with an EHR, government bodies delivering critical services, SaaS vendors with SLA obligations, and energy and logistics platforms that run around the clock. We always start from the same principle: the concrete uptime target, whether 99.9%, 99.99% or 99.999%, and work back to the architecture that delivers it. Not the other way round.

We work closely with your own DevOps or platform engineers, and with our DevOps-as-a-service if that function has not yet been established in-house. The designs we deliver land in code (Terraform, Pulumi, Kubernetes manifests) and in runbook discipline, not just in PDF reports that get forgotten in a Confluence folder.

Three typical HA engagements we deliver.

Which one fits depends on where you stand today: a greenfield HA design, making an existing application HA-capable, or a complete multi-region or multi-cloud setup. In the first conversation we advise which option matches your availability target and budget.

Greenfield engagement · fixed sprint budget

Designing and building an HA platform from scratch

For a new application or a replacement platform, we design the architecture around a chosen availability target. Multiple availability zones, stateless application services, a database cluster with automatic failover, a load balancer with health checks and circuit breakers, and a deployment pipeline that supports blue-green or canary releases. Everything is captured directly in infrastructure as code, so the whole environment is reproducible, whether by us, by you, or by a third party you bring in later.

Architecture blueprintMulti-AZ deploymentIaC (Terraform/Pulumi)CI/CD with blue-green
Brownfield engagement · fixed sprint budget

Upgrading an existing application for high availability

You have a working application that currently runs on a single server, or that only comes back online after manual intervention when something fails. We analyse where the single points of failure sit — usually in the database, in stateful application components or in network routing — and address them step by step: database replication and automatic failover, moving sessions and state out of application services, placing a load balancer, adding a proper observability layer, and building the release pipeline that makes instant rollback possible.

SPOF auditDatabase replication + failoverStateless refactorLoad balancing
Enterprise engagement · fixed sprint budget

Multi-region or multi-cloud HA architecture

For platforms where 99.99% or stricter is required and where the loss of an entire cloud region is a real risk. We build active-active or active-passive setups across multiple regions, with geo-DNS routing, cross-region data replication and a chaos engineering practice that periodically simulates regional outages. Often combined with cloud-native platform development and with edge computing for low latency on traffic arriving from different parts of the world.

Active-activeGeo-DNSCross-region replicationChaos engineering

What you receive at the end of a project.

A working, monitored and documented HA system that meets the uptime target we agree together — plus the runbooks, training and deployment pipeline your own team needs to run it.

  • Architecture blueprint with uptime targetA documented design with SLO, error budget, RPO and RTO for each critical flow, plus the reasoning behind every choice between active-active, active-passive and multi-region.
  • Production and staging environments as codeA complete environment in Terraform or Pulumi, running on AWS, GCP or Azure — or hybrid where that makes sense. Reproducibly redeployable in a new region or with a new provider.
  • Database HA and backup strategyLeader-follower or multi-master replication (PostgreSQL with Patroni, MySQL/MariaDB with Galera, CockroachDB or YugabyteDB), point-in-time recovery and a 3-2-1 backup setup that we test periodically.
  • Deployment pipeline with instant rollbackCI/CD with blue-green or canary releases, feature flags for staged rollouts, and a rollback procedure that takes minutes rather than hours.
  • Observability stackPrometheus and Grafana or Datadog for metrics and SLO tracking, OpenTelemetry or Jaeger for distributed tracing, and Pingdom or Checkly for synthetic monitoring from outside your network.
  • Runbook library and on-call setupConcrete runbooks for the most likely incidents, integrated with PagerDuty or Opsgenie. Includes a post-mortem template and the first guided DR drill with your team.
  • Training and knowledge transferWorking sessions for your ops and platform engineers, plus documentation that allows a new colleague to run the system independently without depending on us.
  • Managed service contract (optional)Monitoring, security patching, capacity planning and ongoing development. Fixed monthly fee, with several response-time levels matched to your platform's uptime target.

When an HA system is the right choice.

Four patterns we repeatedly see among organisations that approach us for high-availability work. If you recognise one of them, we'd be happy to continue the conversation.

Mission-critical

Downtime costs money or trust directly

You run a payment platform, an order flow on a large e-commerce domain, a telecom service or an EHR that clinicians rely on in real time. Every minute of outage means rejected transactions, lost revenue, complaints or worse. A single-region, single-database setup is then a risk that no longer fits the volume or sensitivity of your business.

SLA pressure

You have contractual uptime obligations

Your business customers, particularly larger corporates and government bodies, require 99.9% or 99.99% in the contract, with penalties for breaches. Your current platform doesn't consistently meet that, or it lacks the measurement and evidence layer needed to demonstrate compliance. An SLO-driven monitoring setup with error budgets closes that gap on both sides.

Peaks

Traffic is unpredictable or seasonal

Black Friday, ticket sales, year-end closing in HR software, a media campaign: you face extreme spikes on top of a normal pattern, and you can't afford a capacity problem at exactly that moment. Auto-scaling, graceful degradation and separating critical from non-critical flows keep the entire application from collapsing under pressure.

Compliance

Regulators demand demonstrable continuity

DNB, the AFM, NEN 7510, BIO or a sector-specific standard requires you to demonstrate continuity of your services, with tested failover procedures and a documented disaster recovery (DR) plan. A paper plan without a tested implementation no longer constitutes valid evidence. We link the design to periodic DR drills that do provide proof, often in combination with an ISO 27001 project.

Not yet sure about a large project?

Test your idea first: a working prototype in 1 day

With OneDayBuild, we turn your idea into something tangible in one day for €1,150, so you can see whether further development is worth the investment. Decide to go ahead with the full build? Then we credit the full cost.

Explore OneDayBuild →

How an HA project works with us.

1

Introduction and goal-setting

A conversation in which we establish which flows in your platform are truly mission-critical, which can afford some downtime, and which uptime target suits them. Not every flow needs 99.99%; some need more. We also map what your current measurement and monitoring layer already shows, which is usually the best starting point for the design.

2

Architecture review and blueprint

A short discovery phase in which we test the current architecture against your uptime target: where are the single points of failure, where is state that we would rather no longer tie to a single node, how does database replication stand, and what does the network path look like? At the end you receive a concrete blueprint, a sprint plan and a prioritisation of the changes with the greatest impact.

3

Building in sprints

We work in two-week sprints and deliver a working, production-tested improvement every sprint. We often start with the observability layer, since without measurement you can't tell whether an intervention helps, and then work through the database layer, the application layer and the deployment pipeline. Our engineers pair with your own platform engineers where they exist; knowledge transfer is built into every sprint rather than left until the end.

4

Drills, post-mortems and ongoing operation

After go-live, we plan the first DR drill: we simulate a targeted failure in a production-like environment and check whether failover, observability and runbooks do what they promised. We then join a chaos engineering cadence and post-mortems of real incidents, so the architecture and runbooks keep improving rather than slowly eroding. Where needed, we also work on a separate disaster recovery platform for disaster recovery.

Frequently asked questions about high availability.

The questions platform owners, IT managers and CTOs usually ask us before a project begins.

What exactly is a high-availability system?
An HA system is a platform designed to keep functioning when one or more underlying components fail: a server, a database replica, a network link, or even an entire cloud availability zone. In practice, this means redundancy at every critical layer, automatic failover rather than manual intervention, and monitoring that detects faults before your customers report them. HA is usually expressed as an uptime percentage such as 99.9%, 99.99% or 99.999%, and each additional nine brings a considerable jump in both architectural complexity and cost.
What is the difference between high availability and disaster recovery?
HA is about preventing downtime: redundancy, failover, load balancing and monitoring ensure that a fault in one component does not cascade through to your end users. Disaster recovery is about what you do when, despite all the redundancy, a larger incident still occurs — a corrupted database, a region-wide outage, a security incident — and how you get back online within an agreed timeframe with your data intact. The two overlap, but they are not the same. A good HA system also has a DR plan; a DR plan without HA means you recover more quickly after a major crisis, not that you prevent minor outages.
What is the cost difference between 99.9% and 99.99% uptime?
Considerable, and not linear. 99.9% allows for roughly 8.76 hours of unavailability per year; 99.99% allows about 52 minutes, and 99.999% a tight 5 minutes. Each additional nine means that issues which could previously be resolved manually or as a one-off must now be fully automated and redundant — more replicas, more regions, stricter deployment disciplines, a staffed on-call team and chaos engineering. In the first conversation we establish which level is realistic and worthwhile for your business. Not every application warrants 99.99%; many internal tools are perfectly well served by 99.5%.
Do we need multi-region, or is multi-AZ sufficient?
For most Dutch applications, a multi-AZ setup within a single region is sufficient and considerably cheaper than multi-region. Availability zones within one region practically never fail simultaneously, and the latency between them is low enough to support synchronous database replication. We reserve multi-region primarily for cases where the business must rule out an entire cloud region as a genuine risk — typically in financial services, telecoms or internationally operating platforms — or where regulatory requirements call for data residency across several countries. We would rather recommend multi-AZ with a tested cross-region DR procedure than a half-hearted active-active setup that never survives a drill in practice.
Can you make our existing application HA-capable without rebuilding it?
In many cases, yes. We begin with a single-point-of-failure (SPOF) audit: where does state live, where are the singleton processes, how is the database configured, and what happens during a network outage? For many applications it is feasible to work towards HA in stages — database replication and automatic failover, moving sessions out of the application, placing a load balancer in front, a proper observability layer, and only then the more difficult refactors. Sometimes a fundamental rebuild is unavoidable because the architecture stands in the way of HA; we say so honestly rather than promising to patch it up with a few plug-ins.
How do you arrange database HA?
It depends on the database and your requirements. For PostgreSQL we often use Patroni or Stolon for leader-follower replication with automatic failover and point-in-time recovery. For MySQL or MariaDB we use a Galera cluster or a managed RDS variant. Where latency and write scaling are critical, we look at multi-master solutions such as CockroachDB or YugabyteDB. We do not choose technology based on trends — we choose based on fit with your workload, your team and your operational reality, and we deliver a tested procedure for backup-restore and failover drills.
Do you work alongside our own DevOps or platform engineers?
Almost always. HA work is precisely the kind of work that your own team must sustain after go-live — otherwise the design erodes within a year. We work in pairs with your engineers, transfer knowledge in every sprint, and deliver documentation and runbooks that new colleagues genuinely find useful. If you do not yet have a platform team, we can temporarily fill the DevOps role through our DevOps-as-a-service, until you are staffed in-house.
What determines the cost of an HA project?
Mainly three things: the uptime target you've chosen, how far your current setup is from that target, and how much of the build your own team will do. A 99.9% multi-AZ project on a reasonably clean application is fundamentally different from a 99.99% multi-region setup for a legacy monolith with a lot of entrenched state. The choices between managed services and self-managed infrastructure also weigh heavily, as does whether you'd like us to take on monitoring and on-call or handle them in-house. We outline the range in the first conversation, and we always work with fixed sprint prices so you aren't caught out by surprises.
Do you also build HA for enterprise platforms?
Yes. For larger organisations we deliver HA work as part of broader enterprise software projects: integration with a corporate identity provider, change advisory boards around releases, SLA levels per system component, and alignment with an existing SOC or MSP. The difference from an SME project lies mainly in governance, not in the technology. The architectural principles are the same.

Talk to us about your high availability platform.

A free, no-obligation half-hour introductory call. We listen to which flows are mission-critical, to your current architecture, and to the uptime target that suits your business, and we give direction you can use straight away, even if we ultimately don't work together.

Edit content