Service · AI development

AI consultant Netherlands.

Strategy and implementation for organisations that want to get started with AI: vendor-independent, mid-market to enterprise. We advise on use cases, choose tooling, address the AI Act and GDPR, and also build where needed.

Vendor-independentAI Act & GDPRPilot to productionEU data residency

An AI consultant who also builds.

Most AI challenges don't stall on the technology but on the choices behind it: which use case first, which model, how it fits within the AI Act and GDPR, and how to measure success without it becoming an expensive playground. These questions call for a consultant who understands the difference between a RAG implementation and an agent, who can see past vendors' marketing claims, and who has written code themselves.

We combine strategy work with building capacity. Not a pure advisor who hands the implementation to another party and hopes the assumptions hold, but also not a build shop that skips the strategy work and comes up with an impressive demo that never makes it into production. We help SMEs with their first AI project, mid-market companies with scaling pilots into production, and enterprise CIOs with a portfolio approach and governance.

Our positioning is deliberately mid-market: we are more pragmatic than the Big Four and MBB strategy firms, and we are vendor-independent where Microsoft or AWS partners cannot be. We work from our Amsterdam office, with EU data residency as standard, and at a pace that suits how your organisation actually moves, not how a sales deck imagines it. For a large enterprise AI implementation programme, we fold this approach into a multi-year portfolio; for a small or medium-sized business, it may simply be one sharply scoped use case.

What an AI consultant at Appfront does.

Three types of engagement we are asked for most often. The right choice depends on where your organisation stands and how much room there is for experimentation.

Discovery & orientation

AI discovery and use-case prioritisation

For organisations that know AI will matter but are still looking for focus. We interview stakeholders from business, IT and compliance, map where AI could add value, and deliver a prioritised shortlist of use cases with an honest ROI estimate. This includes tooling advice, an AI Act impact scan per use case, and a clear view of where your organisation is not yet ready. We typically complete discovery engagements within a few sprints.

Use-case mappingROI estimateTooling adviceAI Act scan
Strategy & pilot

AI strategy and pilot delivery

The next step once discovery is complete: a concrete roadmap, a governance framework, and the first pilot. We define the success criteria up front, build the pilot ourselves or guide your team through it, and make sure the outcome gives you a sound go/no-go decision rather than a non-committal demo. This is the phase where you can draw on our experience with multi-LLM architectures, RAG on your own data, and setting up an evaluation set that stays under control.

RoadmapGovernancePilot designBuild or co-build
Implementation & platform

AI implementation and platform engineering

For organisations that are past the pilot phase and want to embed AI as a lasting capability. Think of an LLM gateway for multiple departments, a RAG infrastructure on your own data, vendor-independent model routing, cost monitoring per team, and a governance layer that reassures the audit committee. For specialist use cases we also build custom, such as an AI agent that carries out tasks independently, or a document pipeline with human review.

LLM gatewayRAG infrastructureMulti-LLM routingMonitoring

What you walk away with.

An AI consultancy engagement is only successful once your organisation can carry on without us. These are the concrete deliverables we provide as standard:

  • Prioritised use-case portfolioA shortlist with ROI estimate, complexity score and AI Act classification per use case, rather than a long list of wishes.
  • Tooling advice and vendor comparisonA well-founded choice between ChatGPT Teams, Claude for Enterprise, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini and open-source options, suited to your security requirements.
  • AI Act and GDPR overlayA working document that sets out, per use case, which articles apply, what documentation is required, and who owns which risk.
  • Pilot or production implementationBuilt by us or together with your team. Includes the codebase, monitoring, evaluation set and a risk-managed path to scaling.
  • Workforce readiness planA concrete training programme for employees and management, linked to the AI literacy obligation under Article 4 of the AI Act.
  • Ongoing AI coaching (optional)A fractional CTO-AI role: a fixed number of hours per week or month to test strategic choices, join vendor discussions and keep the roadmap on track.

How we compare with other AI consultants.

The AI consultancy market is broad. Here is a brief orientation on where we do and don't fit, which is more honest than a comparison table with green ticks everywhere on our side.

Versus the Big Four

More pragmatic and mid-market

Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC offer scale and multidisciplinary teams, but their mid-market offerings are typically expensive and tend to stall at the strategy stage. We work with smaller teams, shorter lead times, and we also handle execution.

Versus MBB strategy firms

We also build

McKinsey, BCG and Bain deliver excellent strategy, but not technical implementation. For AI, that is a gap: without hands-on building experience, you cannot realistically assess models, RAG architecture and evaluation sets.

Versus vendor consultants

No reseller interest

Microsoft AI advisers, AWS partners and OpenAI consultants have commercial interests in their own platforms. We have no reseller agreement and choose the model that fits, even if it is open-source and earns us no margin.

Versus freelance AI consultants

Team continuity and build capacity

An experienced AI freelancer is a good choice for clearly defined questions. For longer engagements or build capacity, organisations face single-point-of-failure risks. We offer a team that can combine strategy and build.

Who this works for.

Four situations in which our AI consultancy typically fits. If you recognise yourself, we are likely a good conversation partner.

Mid-sized businesses with first AI questions

ChatGPT or something of your own?

You know colleagues are using ChatGPT, but you want control over data, costs and risks. We help you choose between a team licence, a secure enterprise version or your own solution on your data, including honest advice on when an expensive custom route isn't worth it yet.

Mid-market first project

Turning a pilot into production

A working proof of concept exists, but now the harder questions arrive: security review, GDPR, change management, ownership. We bring structure to this phase without stifling the innovative tone, and ensure the pilot receives a fair production benchmark.

Enterprise CIO or CTO

AI mandate without a portfolio

The board has named AI as a priority, and you need to build a portfolio. We deliver the discovery, governance and multi-LLM platform architecture that this scale demands, either alongside or in collaboration with the large strategy firms already advising the board.

Industry and trade associations

Members want direction

You represent a sector where AI is moving in quickly. We help develop sector-wide frameworks, set up knowledge sessions and write pragmatic guidance for your membership, translated to the reality of your members rather than generic whitepaper language.

Board members and executives

Non-technical but accountable

You need to make decisions about AI without being a developer yourself. We translate the choices into understandable questions, shield you from vendor spin, and where needed help build an AI steering group with you that can keep asking the right questions of IT and the business.

HR and L&D managers

Making the AI training need concrete

Your organisation wants AI literacy and has a budget, but no idea where to begin. We help structure the training offering, develop role-specific learning paths and document AI Act Article 4 compliance in a single engagement.

Not yet sure about a large project?

Test your idea first: a working prototype in 1 day

With OneDayBuild, we turn your idea into something tangible in one day for €1,150, so you can see whether further development is worth the investment. Decide to go ahead with the full build? Then we credit the full cost.

Explore OneDayBuild →

How an AI consultancy engagement runs.

1

Introduction and context

A conversation in which we understand where your organisation stands, what the board's question is, and which risks or compliance themes have already been identified. No sales patter: we will also tell you honestly when you do not yet need a consultant, or which question must be answered first for an engagement to make sense. This conversation is non-binding and typically takes half an hour to three quarters of an hour.

2

Discovery and use-case portfolio

Stakeholder interviews with business, IT and compliance, an AI maturity scan, and a working session to cluster and prioritise use cases. Outcome: a prioritised shortlist with an ROI estimate, complexity score and AI Act risk classification for each use case. This forms the foundation for a sound AI strategy. We make sure the output is immediately usable, even if you decide to pause after this phase.

3

Roadmap and governance

We translate the shortlist into a phased roadmap, set up the governance framework (AI Act, GDPR, and where relevant DORA or NEN 7510), and align with IT, legal and the business owners. This includes vendor-neutral tooling advice and a candid conversation about which use cases are better not pursued. The governance layer is kept lightweight where possible and stricter where it needs to be, depending on your sector and risk profile.

4

Pilot or first implementation

The first use case is delivered. We either build it ourselves or guide your team through the build. We agree a measurable success criterion upfront, an evaluation set to assess quality objectively, and an honest go/no-go decision at handover. We often provide an interim AI tech lead during the first sprints to steer the technical direction and bring your team along with the way of working.

5

Scaling and ongoing support

Successful use cases become part of a platform approach: an LLM gateway, RAG infrastructure, monitoring, and cost control per team. We can stay involved as a fractional partner on a fixed number of hours per month, or hand over fully to your team, depending on what suits you best. Choosing between the two is not a matter of pride: for some organisations, full handover is precisely the success criterion of the engagement.

Compliance and regulatory context.

The legal landscape around AI in 2026 is more mature than it was two years ago, but it is still evolving. We help you navigate the regulatory landscape without unnecessary pessimism or false certainty.

The common thread: document what you do, classify your use cases, and make sure the people who carry out or review the work understand why they are working with AI. The rest is detail specific to each sector. In practice, we see that organisations with this foundation in place start AI projects more quickly, because review points become predictable. Not because the rules are lighter, but because they know what they need to demonstrate.

  • AI Act (EU Regulation 2024/1689)Phased entry into force since 2025. Prohibited practices already apply, transparency requirements and the AI literacy obligation have followed, and the high-risk regime is expanding further.
  • Article 4 AI literacyEmployers must ensure that staff who work with AI have sufficient AI literacy. We include a concrete plan as standard in our programme. See also our AI literacy training.
  • Art. 9-15 high-risk systemsApplications in HR, credit scoring, education or public administration are subject to stricter requirements on risk management, data quality, logging and human oversight.
  • GDPR and UAVG overlapAI systems almost always process personal data. A DPIA per use case, a clear lawful basis and purpose limitation are standard parts of our advice.
  • DORA for the financial sectorOperational resilience and third-party risk are becoming increasingly important in vendor selection. We map this out for banks, insurers and payment institutions.
  • NEN 7510 for healthcareThe Dutch information security standard applies to hospitals, mental health providers and health insurers. AI applications must fit within that framework, including logging and authorisation.

Frequently asked questions.

The questions that boards, IT managers and compliance officers usually ask us in the first conversation.

What exactly does an AI consultant do?
An AI consultant helps your organisation make the right choices: which use cases are relevant, which tooling fits, how the AI Act and GDPR apply, and how to move from pilot to production. In our case, we add build capacity on top of that. We don't just advise; we can also implement or steer an implementation partner. That means our advice is always realistic about what works in the build phase, because we have already solved the complexity ourselves.
How does Appfront differ from the Big Four or strategy consultancies?
The Big Four (Deloitte, EY, KPMG, PwC) and MBB strategy consultancies (McKinsey, BCG, Bain) bring scale and methodology, but their mid-market offerings are usually expensive and often stall at the strategy stage. We work more pragmatically, on a mid-market budget, and we also handle execution: strategy and build from one team. For enterprise portfolios, we can work alongside these firms, or become the implementation partner that takes their strategy into production.
How does this differ from a vendor consultant?
A Microsoft AI adviser, AWS partner or OpenAI consultant has a commercial interest in their own platform. We are vendor-independent: we build with ChatGPT Enterprise, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini or open-source models, depending on what suits your security requirements, data location and use case, not our partner programme. That gives you more honest advice and a better starting position if you want to switch models in a year's time.
How does an engagement like this begin?
With a half-hour introductory call in which we understand where you stand. This is usually followed by a short discovery phase of a few sprints: interviews, a maturity scan and a use-case workshop. That produces a concrete proposal for strategy or a pilot. We don't work on long preliminary engagements without a tangible output: every piece of advice we deliver stands on its own and is immediately useful, even if you decide after the discovery phase to carry on yourselves.
How do you handle the AI Act?
The AI Act (EU Regulation 2024/1689) enters into force in phases. For most organisations, the most relevant parts are Art. 4 (AI literacy), the transparency requirements, and the classification as high-risk or not relevant. As standard, we provide an AI Act overlay per use case: which articles apply, what documentation is required, and who is accountable. For sector-specific compliance, we also look at the GDPR, DORA (financial sector) and NEN 7510 (healthcare). We make no legal guarantees; for formal advice, we work together with your legal team or a specialist law firm.
What determines the cost of a programme?
Mainly the scope: a discovery phase with three stakeholder interviews is a very different engagement from a full strategy, pilot and implementation chain. Other factors include the number of locations, the complexity of existing systems, sector-specific compliance, and whether we deliver fully or co-build with your team. In the first conversation, we outline a few options with corresponding sprint budgets. We work on the basis of sprint budgets rather than fixed-price contracts, because AI engagements carry too much uncertainty to pin everything down upfront, and a fixed price would more likely cost you money than save it.
Do you build it yourselves, or do you guide our own developers?
Both are possible. We build end to end, from RAG infrastructure to agent development to LLM gateway, for organisations without their own capacity. But we co-build just as often: your team builds, and we provide architecture, code reviews and direction. For enterprise implementations, the latter is usually the smarter route, because the capability has to land within your organisation and your people have to sustain it in the long term. For SME clients, full delivery is often more practical.
Are you genuinely vendor-independent?
Yes. We have no reseller agreement with Anthropic, OpenAI, Microsoft or Azure. We work with all the major LLM providers and open-source models, choosing based on what suits your use case, data location and budget. If an open-source model running in your VPC is the best option, we will recommend it, even if a vendor consultant would stand to make a margin on something else. For longer engagements we also look explicitly at exit scenarios: what if you want to switch vendors in two years, and how do you keep that option open?
Can this also be an ongoing role rather than a one-off engagement?
Yes. For organisations that want to deploy AI on an ongoing basis without hiring a dedicated senior AI lead straight away, we offer a fractional CTO (AI) role or an interim AI tech lead. A fixed number of hours per week or month, during which we test strategic choices, join vendor discussions, monitor the roadmap and coach your own team. This is often a natural follow-on from an implementation project.

Talk to us about your AI challenge.

A no-obligation introductory call of half an hour. We listen to where your organisation stands, ask questions that make the right next step clear, and will also tell you honestly when you don't yet need a consultant. Call or email Fabian directly at fabian.vandijk@appfront.nl, or book through the contact form.

Edit content